![]() |
As a result of H-Bahai discussions of my paper "Conversion of the Great Uncle of the Bab"
the issue came up regarding a letter of the Khal-i Akbar,
dated 5 Rajab 1277 A.H. [17 Jan 1861]. In this letter the uncle of the Bab tells
his son, the celebrated Vakilu'd-Dawlih, of the news of his visit
with Baha'u'llah -- and by extension, the revelation of the Kitab-i
Iqan (Baha'u'llah's Book of Certitude).
For the text of this letter I was relying on the version printed
in the Khanidan-i Afnan. However since occasionally this book
contains minor errors and I wanted to be certain about such an
important date, I wrote the World Centre of the Baha'i Faith (in Haifa, Israel)
and asked if the original of this letter of the uncle was on file with them.
Through the kindness of the Research Department of the World Center,
I received a facsimile of the original letter which I will print in the
forthcoming volume, In the Land of Refuge: Two Narratives of
Mirza Habib Afnan (Oneworld Press).
The original of this letter clearly indicates its date, 5 Rajab.
Therefore we can now be certain that the Kitab-i Iqan was revealed
prior to mid January 1861.
In my letter to the World Centre I had asked of both "1280" and
"18 years" business mentioned in the Iqan. They have replied
that the "1280 years since the manifestation of the Point of
Furqan" is not meant as an exact date and is simply a large
number giving approximate time-frame. Also about "18 years," one
should count 1260 as year 1, then 1277 would be year 18.
Therefore the internal evidence of the Iqan also indicates that
it was revealed in 1277 A.H, probably in Jamadiyu'th-Thani of
that year, or late Dec/early Jan of 1861.
Moreover and thankfully, the Research Dept clarified another
point that I had been confused about. I had noted that the Text
of Baha'u'llah's Tablet in the Khanidan Afnan addressed to
Mirza `Abdu'l-Hamid Shirazi in which the visit of the uncle and
the revelation of the Iqan is discussed was very different than
the text of the same Tablet in Nuri'd-Din's collection of
Tablets.
They noted that my confusion stemmed from the fact the the author
of the Khanidan Afnan had misidentified the Tablet that he quotes.
The correct recipient of this Tablet should be Ibn Asdaq.
The one I had discovered in the Nuri'd-Din's collection is indeed
addressed to Mirza `Abdu'l-Hamid. Research Dept notes to their
knowledge only these two Tablets of Baha'u'llah discuss the the
revelation of the Book of Certitude.
For more on Baha'u'llah's Book of Certitude
see Christopher Buck's
The Kitab-i Iqan: An Introduction to Baha'u'llah's Book of Certitude
Occasional Papers in Shaykhi, Babi and Baha'i Studies, Vol. 2, No. 5 (June, 1998)