In The Age of the World Target (2006) Rey Chow argues that we now live in an era in which “the target” is a key technological, geopolitical, and cultural figure. New technologies of targeting are emerging to reach global destinations with pinpoint precision; yet, errors result in accidental or unintentional targeting. “Being targeted” has become an everyday reality for many individuals and social groups: citizens are targets of national security states and mass Internet surveillance; “terrorists” (but also civilians) are targets of drone strikes; young individuals in U.S. cities are routinely targets of racial profiling by police. The overdetermined figure of the target reveals a sense of crisis on multiple fronts. It raises pressing questions about the relation between subjects and objects; the limits of the juridical; national identity and sovereignty; territoriality and deterritorialization; the relation between the human and technology; race and ethnicity; the relation between past and present technologies of targeting; and the nature of knowledge production under neoliberalism. This panel seeks to explore these and other questions in relation to an array of genres, methodologies, and media. We are interested in aggressive “target practices” that occur when America is at war. We welcome global perspectives on the multi-directional dynamics of targeting but also seek studies of how the U.S. targets others in both domestic and foreign contexts. Given the relation between technologies and epistemologies of targeting and the emergence of comparative disciplines such as Area Studies, thinking the target enables reflection on “research as a practice of the imagination,” for the “areas” we study “are not facts but artifacts of our interests and our fantasies as well as our needs to know, to remember, and to forget” (Arjun Appadurai, “Grassroots Globalization”).
Contact: Melissa Stephens (email@example.com) and Theo Finigan (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Targeting and optics
Targeting technologies (e.g. drones, surveillance, satellites, social media)
The ethics and legality of targeting (e.g. extrajudicial killings)
The spatiality of the target (e.g. “drone geographies,” the “gunbelt”)
Domestic targets (e.g. school shootings, “stop-and-frisk” tactics, undocumented immigrants, the new Jim Crow and imprisonment)
Targeting as tactic of state power/empire
The U.S. as target
Rhetorics and narratives of targeting
The bio-politics of targeting
The ACLA's annual conferences have a distinctive structure in which most papers are grouped into twelve-person seminars that meet two hours per day for three days of the conference to foster extended discussion. Some eight-person (or smaller) seminars meet just the first two days of the conference. This structure allows each participant to be a full member of one seminar, and to samplee other seminars during the remaining time blocks. The conference also includes plenary sessions, workshops and roundtable discussions, a business meeting, a banquet, and other events. See http://acla.org/annual-meeting/about-annual-meeting for more information.
Send comments and questions to H-Net
Webstaff. H-Net reproduces announcements that have been submitted to us as a
free service to the academic community. If you are interested in an announcement
listed here, please contact the organizers or patrons directly. Though we strive
to provide accurate information, H-Net cannot accept responsibility for the text of
announcements appearing in this service. (Administration)