Deadline for pre-review: December 15, 2012.
Deadline for final submission: April 15, 2013.
The role that animals play in the formation of disciplinary knowledge has never held particular importance in the course of Michel Foucault’s articulated research. This “oversight” could partially be due to chronological reasons: the passing of Foucault came in the very years that the so-called “animal question” began to emerge.
Nonetheless, reflections on the animal run throughout Foucault’s major texts, though sometimes in discreet or underlying ways. It cannot be a coincidence that the most interesting works on forms of non-human life from the last 20 years were put forth by thinkers who, for various reasons, were comfronting Foucault’s legacy. One needs only think of "The Open" by Giorgio Agamben and Jacques Derrida’s "The Animal That Therefore I Am" and "The Beast and the Sovereign," as well as the seminal "Bubbles" and “Rules for the Human Zoo” by Peter Sloterdijk – all texts that are enjoying a great deal of fortune within the field of animal studies.
Animals conceal their tracks in different places throughout Foucault’s works, and, though discreet, the passages are always extremely meaningful: in "The Order of Things," animals share a destiny of confinement with the subjects of psychiatric power and carry out a central role in the Foucauldian genealogy of the rational subject. Throughout "The Abnormals" one can retrace important analyses of the changes in relations between men and animals between the medieval ages and modernity, as if the modifications in such relations could provide a key to accessing different governmental paradigms which characterized these two historical eras. Elsewhere, Foucault concludes that disciplinary knowledge could have never been established without experimentation on the bodies of animals in the laboratory. And what are the three volumes of The History of Sexuality if not a reconstruction of the increasingly thorough hunt for the “bestiality” of pleasures? How could one not compare the concept of “biopolitics” – by now a “floating signifier” in contemporary political thought – with the animalization of man Foucault introduces in "Biopolitics and Liberalism"? After all, the paradigm of power from which biopolitics originates is pastoral power, and here we find yet another confirmation that the government of men and the domestication of animals are part of a same history. It is in light of this conclusion that the concept of zoopolitics is acquiring an ever-growing importance.
Animal rights, environmental legislation, the establishment of scientific knowledge, the subjugation of bodies, human/non-human divide, the governing of the living. The intention of this volume of "Animal Studies" dedicated to Foucault’s animals is to lay out the implicit tensions in the Foucaldian corpus, with the aim to provide all those who act in the name of anti-speciesism further occasions for debate and research.
Potential contributors are encouraged to submit an essay proposal to the journal editors (firstname.lastname@example.org) by 15 December, 2012. Final papers must not exceed 8000 words in total (including all references and notes) and shout be submitted by 15 April, 2013.
Send comments and questions to H-Net
Webstaff. H-Net reproduces announcements that have been submitted to us as a
free service to the academic community. If you are interested in an announcement
listed here, please contact the organizers or patrons directly. Though we strive
to provide accurate information, H-Net cannot accept responsibility for the text of
announcements appearing in this service. (Administration)