Re: e-grading A COMMENT

G. L. Seligmann (GUS@cas.unt.edu)
Sun, 14 Apr 1996 16:48:58 CST6CDT

G. L. Seligmann (AcadCore, x3399) wrote:
>
> Professors who allow their students to submit classwork
> electronically are devising new ways to grade and edit papers.
> "The old standby editing marks just don't work," says one
> professor, who's devised a notation system using a series of
> parentheses and brackets for use in the electronic environment.
I have my students file stories electronically. I use CAPs for corrections
rather than RED marks.
Another professor just prints the homework out and marks it up
> with a pen, old-fashioned-style.
This is really dumb.
Some professors see a plus in
> the ability to insert stock comments easily: "I suspect that
> most anyone who has graded lower-division papers sometimes wishes
> for a rubber stamp to address issues that arise over and over,"
> says an assistant professor of philosophy at Oregon State
> University.
This is silly
E-mail "allows me to put in a lot of commentary
> without having to make redundant comments." But he still misses
> grading papers at the breakfast table. (Chronicle of Higher
> Education 12 Apr 96 x Edupage)
I find I can provide comments much more quickly to students, so they can
get them before class the next time. It's a good system. I am a bit
nonplussed by the silly manner in which the above article is written.
--

Christopher Harper Director of Graduate Studies Department of Journalism New York University 212-998-3846