Ben Kohl
bkohl@temple.edu
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
2008
SYLLABUSDescription | Required Texts and Assignments | Class Schedule | Grading | Course Policies |
| | ||
I |
Attendance, participation, and in-class exercises | 25% |
II |
Presentations of readings, reading outline, summary | 15% |
III |
Exam I (week 7, March 4, in class) | 15% |
IV |
Book review (1200 words) and oral presentation (written review due week 12, April 15) | 15% |
V |
Final exam, take home (due week15, May 8) | 25% |
VI |
Class and self evaluation, (due week 15, May 8) | 5% |
|
SCHEDULE Schedule is subject to change. All reading for the week must be done before class on Tuesday unless
noted. |
|
Part I: Introduction: Globalization, Cities and Urban Systems In this section of the course we provide the background for the broader debates on how the changing global economy is changing urban societies around the world. |
|
As the course focuses on the intersection of the global economy and urban society, we begin with a discussion of globalization. What are we talking about when we discuss globalization? Is it strictly the spread of market (neoliberal) economics across the globe? Proponents of globalization argue that ‘free’ markets will bring progress, democracy and better standards of living to the world’s poor. Has this proven to be true?
Cities do not function as isolated units but are integrated, to a greater or lesser degree, into a single interdependent global urban system. No single event or factor determines the fate of a city, but instead the combination of geographic, historical, political, environmental and social elements interact with the actions of individual actors to shape (and reshape) cities. The first reading serves to locate the general discussion within a single family to reinforce the point that the processes we are considering eventually affect individual agents; the next describes the global distribution of urban populations; and the last two illustrate different approaches to thinking about cities.
Week 3, February 5 and 7. Cities in History While changing economic, technological and political relations have rapidly increased the pace of globalization in the past 50 years, we note that even before the current ‘global’ era cities served as administrative centers of empires, and sites of trade, and in the industrial age, the point at which natural resources were transformed into manufactured goods. The chapter by Chakravorty demonstrates incomplete transformation resulting from globalization in a megacity.
|
|
Part II. Urban Systems In this part of the course we examine how the changing global economy changes urban societies. |
|
With our initial understanding of urban processes, we can begin to examine how globalization has changed urban systems: in this case we are referring to systems of cities. Historically, scholars have considered this question within a national context, for example, how cities assume specific roles within a national system of cities. With the rapid expansion of the global economy, urban scholars began to think about systems of cities within global, as well as national, networks. The readings by Friedmann and Sassen are typical of these approaches. Potter and Lloyd-Evans describe how national urban systems have changed with globalization. We change focus with the last reading by Marcuse and van Kempen that allows us to begin to examine how globalization has changed the ‘spatial order’ of cities.
Economic globalization has brought about a change in the international division of labor. The (traditional) international division of labor (IDL) refers to the set of processes by which ‘core’ industrial nations like England, Germany, France, the United States, and Japan imported raw materials, transformed them through industrial processes and exported manufactured goods back to the ‘developing’ or ‘third world’. These economic and industrial processes, of course, affected the urban structure of cities. The reading by Frobel relates the change from the IDL to the New IDL (NIDL). The NIDL also brought with it new demands for labor in both rich and poor countries, with resulting changes in patterns of migration as Castles and Miller show. The economic changes also contributed to changing urban structures, as in the case of Singapore, a ‘winner’ in the process of global restructuring.
Week 6, February 26 and 28. New Urban Economies and review for exam Changes from a Fordist to a post-Fordist global economy, are, of course, not only rooted in technological advances and changes in markets, but also in physical places and the daily lives of real people. Sassen sets the stage for understanding these events, and Garson tries to connect abstract global financial circuits and real people. Goldsmith turns the usual argument around suggesting that US urban structure, in fact, has contributed not only to changes in the global economy, but will also contribute to changes in the urban structure of cities around the world.
Spring Break March 11 and 13 |
|
Part III. Cities and processes in the global system. |
|
In the changing global economy some cities, like Miami or Singapore, and more specifically, groups of people within them, are increasingly successful. But not everyone shares in the success as industrial jobs are limited and globalization, as shown in the case of Rio de Janeiro, brings increased inequality.
Week 9, March 25 and 27. Inequality and Neoliberalism Sassen argues that globalization brings with it new forms of inequality and social exclusion. Friedmann shows how inequality is produced in China. The reading on neoliberalism provides the foundation to understand an alternative explanation of how cities are changing in the global economy. While we will return to the theme of neoliberalism repeatedly in coming weeks, Wacquant’s article provides a striking example of one manifestation of the neoliberal turn in global economic policy has affected domestic politics to give rise to the criminalization of poverty.
This week we finish Sassen and read two articles that identify problems with her hypothesis and a third that proposes a competing theory suggesting that neoliberalism may be a more useful concept for understanding changes in global urban structure.
Economic globalization is, to a great extent, synonymous with neoliberal globalization or, more simply, neoliberalism. Sandercock and Pryke show how neoliberalism affects urban life. Portes and Roberts show the impacts on a regional level while, in their portrait of La Paz, Farthing, Arbona, and Kohl suggest that neoliberalism may generate its own particular urban form. Nevins illustrates one dimension of the neoliberal turn, represented in the economic dependence on workers who lack the basic social and legal protections of citizens.
|
|
Part IV. Globalizing cities
During this section of the course you will present oral reviews of the books you have read and relate them to the readings we have done during the semester. As we will not all be able to read every book that is being reviewed, you will also need to identify a reading to complement your oral review, which you will post, along with your written review on Blackboard, at least five days before your scheduled presentation. |
|
Assignment: Take home final,
due May 8. |
| Additional information on course policies Religious Holidays Academic Freedom Academic Honesty
|
| Syllabus copyright ©2008 Ben Kohl. All rights reserved. Syllabus prepared 28 February 2010 for H-Urban
Teaching Center. |