"Many Kinds of Busyness":
Women's Household Labor in Early Ohio

Tamara G. Miller
Independent Scholar

Focusing on the women of Washington County, Ohio between 1788, when the county was first settled by Anglo-Americans, and 1850, this paper will trace both the changing nature and valuation of women's household work as the region's economy shifted from one characterized primarily by agriculture and household production to a more market-oriented economy by the mid-nineteenth century.

During the early years of settlement, women's energies were devoted to household production, and that work was deemed valuable by both men and women.

Women's household production increased during the first several decades after settlement, and the period between 1800 and 1830 became the golden age of household production. But by the second quarter of the nineteenth century, as Washington County's farmers became more extensively involved in commercial agriculture and as cash began to permeate the local economy, women's household production began to decline and women's work for their families became less visible. Women did not lament the change. Men, however, were more concerned, and feared that women were abandoning productive and "profitable" work. A growing number of men began urging women to take up dairying, one of the few branches of female production that could be readily marketed for cash. As household textile production declined, women were encouraged to cultivate silk worms and manufacture silk, another marketable commodity. Women, however, did not respond to these suggestions. In fact, much of women's work had changed very little and remained an integral part of the agricultural economy upon which the growth of the commercial center of Marietta was based. Women did not reject the market, and in fact were involved in the market in numerous ways. In fact, it was often the products of women's labor that first brought cash into rural household. Rather, women's work, like men's, adapted to changing market conditions and was intricately tied to the growth of a commercial economy in early Ohio. Women continued to engage in "profitable" work, but because their new forms of work, unlike textile production and dairying, were not defined exclusively as female work, women's work became less visible, and perhaps less appreciated.