>>> Item number 621, dated 94/05/04 16:11:29 -- ALL

Date:         Wed, 4 May 1994 16:11:29 -0500
Reply-To:     Legal History discussion list <H-LAW@UICVM.BITNET>
Sender:       Legal History discussion list <H-LAW@UICVM.BITNET>
From:         cfcrw@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
Subject:      Ingersoll

Two messages on the Ingersoll question:

41 Yale L.J. 165 (1931) discusses the Pullis case in detail and might have the information that you want. Hope it helps. Caryl Segal (segal@decster.uta.edu)

Bob: Presser and Zainaldin Law & Jurisprudence indicate (602) Joseph Reed was the a.g.--Hopkinson and Ingersoll are co-prosecutors. Gregg Roeber.
> >Ingersoll, Jared 1822 1000 $50.00 >
> ingersol is listed as prosecutor in commonwealth v. pullis (1806), AKA the > philadelphia cordwainers case. the original pamphlet, the reprint in 3 > commons & gilmore, wythe holt (22 osgoode hall law j), and christopher > tomlins (_law, labor and ideology in the early american republic_) all > refer to the ingersol as the atty general of PA. but somewhere, someplace i > saw a note that said that this was a mistake of the reporter. does anyone > else remember seeing this?
>
> -- bob pasker <rbp@brown.edu>

>>> Item number 623, dated 94/05/05 09:49:20 -- ALL

Date:         Thu, 5 May 1994 09:49:20 -0500
Reply-To:     Legal History discussion list <H-LAW@UICVM.BITNET>
Sender:       Legal History discussion list <H-LAW@UICVM.BITNET>
From:         cfcrw@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
Subject:      Ingersoll

From: "E. Nuxoll" <EMNQC@CUNYVM>

According to both the DAB and the Biographical Directory of Congress Ingersoll was attorney general of Pennsylvania from 1790-1799 and 1811-1817 --thus not at the time of the case you cite. The BDC also says he was the U.S. district attorney for the eastern district of Pennsylvania, but does not specify for what dates--however the listing position implies it was between the above two dates. Does that help? E. Nuxoll