Re: Gettysburg, etc.

Peter Knupfer (PKNUPFER@KSUVM.BITNET)
Tue, 12 Oct 1993 18:01:57 ECT

Last year I used the entire Burns set in an intersession course on
Critical Campaigns of the Civil War. The class lasted only about 3
wks, about 3 hrs/day. The class divided into groups, ea. assigned to
a campaign -- and I defined campaign very broadly and way beyond the
stricter and more focused military and operational use of the term. Thus,
one group worked on political campaigns, focusing esp. on 1864 election
& CSA politics; another worked on the naval campaigns; one on diplomacy; a
couple on the West & East, etc. Each group was to devise an argument, based
on research at the library (esp. in reference & maps) for the ultimate
significance (& if possible, determining influence) of assigned campaign
and present it before the class as a group project. The class met in
the morning and viewed one of the Burns videos; took a break; then discussed
the video; then spent some time reviewing with the course text; then broke
into groups for discussion and research. I found the Burns set too exhausting
to use in its entirety -- without a week's break between segments, the
film became too ponderous, heavy-handed, and repetitious. By the 3rd segment
students were whistling Jay Ungar's "Ashokan Farewell" back at the screen.
I felt like offering Saturday Night Live's hilarious takeoff on the series
for comic relief.

Since then I've shifted to selections -- based more on the amount of time
I have available than on the content of the tapes. There is an extensive
teaching packet that comes with the deluxe edition of the series, from PBS.
It includes handouts, teachers aids, transparencies, and an index to the
tapes. The latter would be esp. useful, although I haven't used it. I
had prepared my own rough index while watching the series. I like the
episode that culminates at Antietam -- the series still has a freshness
and sense of unpredictability at that juncture, and it provides a good
opportunity to explore problems related to northern dissent, limited
war strategy, and CSA opportunities to reformulate strategy.

I think it's a wonderful film that very effectively incorporates maps,
photographs, impressionistic sources, and narrative -- its general
thrust, (a rehash of the late 19th c. view that Americans were trapped
in a clash of institutions that deprives most of the participants of
any special responsibility for starting it or fighting it a certain way,
a kind of Simpsons fight over slavery or the "dysfunctional family at war,")
tends to overstress the heroic and futile nature of the conflict, but it
also provokes some thoughtful and reflective discussions by students.

I'd be very interested to hear how others are using or not using the series.

Peter Knupfer
Kansas State University