Re: Tom Beaudoin's query

Kelly Richter (U59611@UICVM.BITNET)
Tue, 5 Oct 1993 11:36:13 ECT

The your incredulity at harsh discipline being imposed on black
troops is misplaced. Accounts of Ferrero's troops in the Army of the
Potomac and the USCT later at Petersburg describe their unusual
discipline in drill and in battle as well as their fighting prowess.
Harsh discipline became the rule not the exception as 1864 wore on, and
though ineffectual on battle weary troops in many instances, was not
eschewed. The Colored Troops knew the deck was stacked against them:
they had to be better than your average white soldier. So did their
white officers. I would read more on 1864-65 period in the Army of the
Potomac and then reconsider your statement.
Kelly Richter U59611@UICVM

> _Glory_ is a good example of the current generation's understanding of
> the Civil War: it stresses the centrality of race and slavery in the making
> of the war and tries to display a range of emotions and attitudes about
> those issues. On some levels, it succeeds simply because its stylized
> characters (rebellious slave; prideful educated free black; Irish drill
> sgt; the usual assortment of racists; naive, ignorant young black; arrogant
> & selfish eastern snob who learns the real meaning of equality; wise old
> soldier) use common stereotypes and literary/narrative devices to get across
> a different interpretation of the war's meaning. I found some scenes in
> the film very compelling. Others I found very hard to believe, including
> the routine whipping of Denzel Washington on a gun carriage -- hard to believe
> because I don't believe black troops would have put up with such treatment
> for a second, and because I doubt anyone was foolish enough to put Irish
> sgts in charge of black troops.