Re: Gettysburg (Oct. 8)

kurt luginbyhl (MNHAD007@SIVM.BITNET)
Mon, 4 Oct 1993 08:41:25 ECT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Robert Harris: "NEH addresses"
Previous message: Vanessa Henry: "Re: Gettysburg (Oct. 8)"
Maybe in reply to: Aric Watson: "Gettysburg (Oct. 8)"
Next in thread: (no name): "Re: Gettysburg (Oct. 8)"

Kurt Luginbyhl 202-357-1955
Sue et al. You said that the battle was as wash as who (Gettysburg) won.
IMHO you may not be looking far enough ahead. The South without the reserves
and resources that the North possessed was just biding time. Grant's idea
of "total war" was to exact a price the South was want to pay. Truly I would
think that you would see that the South was a clear and obvious "loser" at
Gettysburg. If I have reacted to quickly to this post I apologize.

Scientific Computer Specialist
National Museum of Natural History
Washington D.C. 20560

Next message: Robert Harris: "NEH addresses"
Previous message: Vanessa Henry: "Re: Gettysburg (Oct. 8)"
Maybe in reply to: Aric Watson: "Gettysburg (Oct. 8)"
Next in thread: (no name): "Re: Gettysburg (Oct. 8)"