Should writing ‘be called working’, as La Bruyère argued? How have writers projected and problematised their labours against a changing understanding of what it means to ‘work’? Have they operated at a remove from dominant modes and measures of productivity or sought an accommodation? In what sense is literary activity poised between labour and idleness?
This symposium brings together researchers from across the humanities to address the enduringly troubled relationship between writing and ‘work’. It raises questions that are topical when cuts in public spending are prompting scrutiny of what we mean by ‘cultural production’. At the same time, this is a debate with deep historical roots. By taking the long view, this event aims to shed fresh light on some unusually persistent problems. Papers will focus on Western European writing between c. 1790-c. 1910, a formative period in our understanding of the terms of labour, writing and idleness. Against the emergent pressures of labour politics and developing paradigms of industrial production, the conditions of ‘literary labour’ were being scrutinised and reformulated with new urgency.
This event will explore new connections between social history and literary history, focusing less on the depiction of work in others, than on the representation, and self-representation, of writers as ‘workers’. As such, it responds to recent critical interest in the testimony of writers, in the formal qualities of the writing process, and in the scope for its reform or restoration as ‘work’.
Send comments and questions to H-Net
Webstaff. H-Net reproduces announcements that have been submitted to us as a
free service to the academic community. If you are interested in an announcement
listed here, please contact the organizers or patrons directly. Though we strive
to provide accurate information, H-Net cannot accept responsibility for the text of
announcements appearing in this service. (Administration)