“Documentary Proof: Evidence of Age and the Campaign Against Child Labor in the United States”
Susan Pearson, Northwestern University
Numerical age was at the centerpiece of the late-nineteenth and early twentieth-century campaign to restrict child labor. But because most states lacked a complete registry of births, there were no external authorities to which state authorities could appeal when they wished to determine a child’s age. Initially, child labor law enforcement depended entirely on parental affidavits of age. By the early twentieth century, however, opponents of child labor urged states to require “documentary evidence” of age, preferably in the form of a birth certificate, baptismal registry, or some other non-familial, written proof. Such reformed child labor laws gave the power to validate a child’s age to an overlapping network of state agencies – to state factory inspectors, school districts, and health officers. Reliance on documentary proof to establish numerical age was, in turn, part of a much larger shift in authority from families to states and from personal, testamentary knowledge to written documents. Effective child labor law enforcement required changes that were not simply technical and administrative, but also epistemological.
Commentator: Jane Dailey, University of Chicago and James Schmidt, Northern Illinois University
Scholl Center Seminar papers are pre-circulated electronically. For a copy of the paper, e-mail the Scholl Center at firstname.lastname@example.org. Please do not request a paper unless you plan to attend.
Send comments and questions to H-Net
Webstaff. H-Net reproduces announcements that have been submitted to us as a
free service to the academic community. If you are interested in an announcement
listed here, please contact the organizers or patrons directly. Though we strive
to provide accurate information, H-Net cannot accept responsibility for the text of
announcements appearing in this service. (Administration)