According to Frederic Jameson, the cinema is considered the most prodigious form of the art of intertextualization in the post modern era because films are readily accessible to all members of society and can be interpreted with an array of meanings. How do film adaptations fit into the scheme of intertextualization that Jameson describes? How do screen adaptations offer fresh approaches to cinematic art, literary theory, and cultural politics? What standards, if any, must be considered when a literary text as a source is represented or adapted into the cinematic? Can a historical overview of literature to film adaptations be traced? And how important is the study of adaptations to the study of literature or to society, especially in light of the many different academic disciplines now attracted to the analysis of film as commodity, document, and cultural artifact?
Saint Louis University
Department of English
221 N. Grand Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63103 Email: email@example.com
Send comments and questions to H-Net
Webstaff. H-Net reproduces announcements that have been submitted to us as a
free service to the academic community. If you are interested in an announcement
listed here, please contact the organizers or patrons directly. Though we strive
to provide accurate information, H-Net cannot accept responsibility for the text of
announcements appearing in this service. (Administration)