Call for papers for a workshop organised by the International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam, January 25-26, 2002
The IISH invites PhD students
involved with historical research on gender and welfare states in the 20th century
interested in reconsiderations of maternalism and
eager to discuss the pitfalls of international comparisons
to participate in a two-days- workshop 'Maternalism reconsidered: Mothers and method in 20th century history'.
Mothers' rights constitute an essential element in gendered histories of welfare states. Often maternity benefits are juxtaposed with male worker benefits in the context of widespread notions on the development of Western two-channel welfare states. In such cases mothers' rights serve as an indicator of the male breadwinner-mindedness of a given public insurance system at a particular moment in time. But the social rights of women as mothers are historically interesting for more reasons. Experts - like Jane Lewis, Gisela Bock, Pat Thane, Sonya Michel and Seth Koven, Theda Skocpol, Theresa Kulawik, Ann Cova, Christiane Eifert, Joanne Goodwin, Molly Ladd Taylor, Gwendolynn Mink, Lynn Haney and Susan Pedersen - supply us with ample evidence.
The research into mother's rights and the discourse regarding these rights in different countries shed light on the history of for example population policies, the socio-economic (in)dependence of ordinary people and, last but not least, on women's agency in the past. Women have attempted to influence maternity-arrangements, -benefits and the political debates about them in many ways. Feminist power in the debate is a popular theme in the flourishing historiography, as well as the relationship between feminism and maternalism. There are quite a few international comparisons in this area, but ... the concept of maternalism is a slippery one, as Jane Lewis noted in a review in Gender and History, April 1994.
Is it simply policies for women by women? Is it mostly about measures to improve the well-being of mothers and children? Or is it a kind of familial feminism, a strategy to demand civil rights based on the (potential) role of women as mothers? Do we have to see it as a limiting or redistributive way of thinking?
In order to
gain insight in unpublished research on maternity-benefits and the ‘female
voice' in various countries
come to grips with (the pitfalls regarding historical research on) the
relationship between feminism and maternalism in different states
gain a better perception of which interpretation of maternalism
best suits international comparisons
Tthe IISH invites PhD students to supply proposals for a paper (max. 300 words) before the end of April, 2001. To ensure a fruitful discussion, we aim to limit the workshop to ten participants. Sonya Michel and Berteke Waaldijk will comment on the papers.
Send comments and questions to H-Net
Webstaff. H-Net reproduces announcements that have been submitted to us as a
free service to the academic community. If you are interested in an announcement
listed here, please contact the organizers or patrons directly. Though we strive
to provide accurate information, H-Net cannot accept responsibility for the text of
announcements appearing in this service. (Administration)