Tributes of Silence, the Honor of Words
By Robert E. Bonner History News Service
This years Veterans Day comes in the wake of fierce
political campaigning over which policies best serve the
interest of U.S. soldiers. Again and again, candidates in
the campaign that just ended reduced their messages to a
simple claim - that they would be the truest friend and the
staunchest ally of those now fighting for their country
overseas.
The divisive war in Iraq was what drove this fall's march
of troops through dueling political commercials. But history
and tradition both suggest more deeply rooted tendencies
about how we enlist veterans in public life and how rarely
we listen to the actual words of these men and women.
By a coincidence of the calendar, Americans have found in
annual November 11 celebrations an opportunity to replace
the noise of politics with unifying commemorative silences.
This timing is part of why the day's activities still
revolve around gestures like the laying of wreathes, the
parading of flags, the firing of twenty-one guns, and the
solemn march past the all-too-appropriately named Tomb of
the Unknowns at Arlington.
Many of these wordless rituals began four score and seven
years ago, when President Wilson asked Americans to observe
two minutes of silence to honor the victors of the "war to
end all wars." On that first Armistice Day of 1919,
ceremonies on both sides of the Atlantic paid tribute to the
millions who had died in the war that ended a year earlier
-- on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month.
Each succeeding November 11 has featured similarly sober
tributes to those who died in battle. The day's tenor is not
much different from that of Memorial Day services in May, a
tradition established in the 1860s, to mourn the 600,000
Civil War dead.
The focus on soldiers killed in action tends to elevate
the actions of troops over their words. Abraham Lincoln
understood this point as he stood amid the graves of the
Union dead on November 19, 1863. "The world will little
note, nor long remember what we say here," he noted, in a
spectacularly ironic line of his celebrated Gettysburg
Address.
Lincoln then made a nod to the cemetery close at hand to
complete his point. The world could more easily forget his
own carefully crafted address than it could "forget what
they did here." "From these honored dead" who lay silently
at rest, Americans would thereafter "take increased devotion
to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of
devotion."
Well before Armistice Day was rechristened Veterans Day
in 1954, Americans resolved to make the November 11 holiday
a tribute to all those who had served. Memorial Day remained
the day for mourning those who died in uniform. Despite this
partition, there have been few efforts to alter the
choreography of Veterans Day remembrances or to consider how
service, rather than death, might be highlighted by giving
voice to those who have served.
Replacing the silent rituals with the words of soldiers
need not politicize the Veterans Day services of the future.
Wartime writing reveals an enormous range of political
views, despite what candidates for office might sometimes
imply. When pressed, most would concede that the idea of
unanimity within the military runs counter to the highest
ideas of an American citizen-soldiery.
Soldiers' voices are at least as readily available for
consideration as military tombs and cemeteries -- and not
simply in the form of living veterans' reminiscences.
Military men and women have always been eager to record
their experiences while in the ranks and under fire, as an
ever-growing collection of oral histories, diaries and
letters makes clear. Today's troops are adding to this
archive with a constant stream of messages to their homes
via modern telecommunication.
Therefore, a recast Veterans Day would perform a valuable
service if it focused public attention on the common burdens
shared by military personnel across two centuries of war.
Such stories and episodes would heighten an appreciation for
the trials of service and the horrors of war. They could
move us all from silent commemoration to the still more
valuable tribute of remembrance.
Robert E. Bonner is the author of "The Soldier's Pen:
Firsthand Impressions of the Civil War" (2006) and a writer
for the History News Service.
[Robert E. Bonner, 10 Mink Drive, Hanover NH 03755.
Telephone (603) 643-1570; fax: (603) 646-3353; e-mail: Robert.bonner@dartmouth.edu]
History News Service
Co-Directors:
Joyce Appleby: appleby@history.ucla.edu
Telephone: 310-470-8946
James M. Banner, Jr.: jbanner@aya.yale.edu
Telephone: 202-462-5655
Website designed and administered by Christopher
Bates.
This article was posted on November 8, 2006.
Pictured at top (left to right): King Henry VIII
of England, The Mayflower sails for America, Marie Curie,
Woodrow Wilson, Adolf Hitler, A protester faces off against
Chinese tanks at Tianenmen Square.
|