United We Stand? The Unequal Costs of Mobilization
By Rachel Buff History News Service
Recently we witnessed the disturbing spectacle of the
heroes of Sept. 11 fighting each other in the streets of New
York City. Unionized firefighters scuffled with police
officers. Turning the firefighters away from the ongoing
hunt for their lost brethren at the World Trade Center
disaster site, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani urged the
firefighters' union to cooperate with his downsizing of the
search for those lost in the tragedy.
What are we to make of this recent display of division at
Ground Zero? When the mayor of New York tells firefighters
who are nationally celebrated as heroes to listen to his
authority and go home, the message is clear. Those with
power will make the hard decisions about how we will recover
from Sept. 11. In making such decisions, officials such as
Giuliani will purport to speak for the hard-working many.
Wartime mobilization is a time when we are called to
unify in the name of patriotic duty. But the call to stand
united has long been a mixed bag for working Americans.
During both World Wars, for example, mobilization meant
unprecedented job openings for those at home who had been
barred from steady employment. African Americans, other
racial minorities, and women benefited from new
opportunities.
But the patriotic fervor that accompanied wartime
mobilization meant that unions were pressured into
"no-strike" pledges. These pledges limited the power of
workers to bargain collectively. In the context of wartime
patriotism, any signs of dissent were marked as
anti-American.
Just as many of us today accept lines at airports and
other security measures imposed since 9/11, most workers
during both World Wars accepted this restriction. But after
the wars ended, many war workers were pressured to leave
their jobs, or to accept lower-paid, non-union work. The
economic slide of minority and female war workers led
eventually to the demands of these Americans for equal
rights after the wars, including equal employment
opportunity and equal work for equal pay.
As we mobilize for what promises to be a long war in
Asia, how are we to protect the rights of workers at home?
The national economy has changed since the conclusion of
World War II. Instead of bringing economic expansion,
protracted conflict in Vietnam brought economic disaster. As
the United States became increasingly involved in an
undeclared war in Southeast Asia, escalating military
spending undermined financial stability at home, adding to
the national debt. In the 1970s, military spending sounded a
death knell for the social programs meant to end poverty in
this most prosperous nation on earth.
Since Vietnam, an increasingly globalized economy has
meant that many workers in the United States are neither
union members nor citizens. Union membership has declined,
and immigrants have filled many jobs. In the wake of Sept.
11, many of the families of undocumented workers killed at
the World Trade Center struggle to learn the fates of their
loved ones, who were a key part of the economy servicing
this center of commerce. But, like the firefighters turned
away from Ground Zero, they will have an unequal share of
the limited benefits of recovery.
During the same week that the heroes of Sept. 11 clashed
in downtown Manhattan, the national unemployment rose faster
than any time since 1982. As we mobilize for a long and
expensive war, our economic stability is threatened.
Now the Bush administration, under the guise of a $100
billion economic stimulus package, is pressing billions in
tax cuts that will overwhelmingly favor the corporate elite.
Simultaneously, the house rejected proposals to federalize
airport security workers and give them access to collective
bargaining. And we are fighting a war in Afghanistan with an
all-volunteer army, whose recruits are drawn from those who
have the fewest social and economic alternatives.
We are urged to stand together before the world without
noticing the rapid increase in inequality around us. How are
we to be united politically, if we are divided
economically? How are we to spend as in normal times while
the suffering of American working people mounts?
As the New York City firefighters are well aware, the
answer is that we have to be united, to look after each
other. Only valuing all of our labor and lives equally will
lead us to true unity. Recovery from the events of 9/11
should mean economic parity and political democracy, not
putting money and power into the hands of the few.
Rachel Buff is an assistant professor of history at
Bowling Green State University in Bowling Green, Ohio, and a
writer for the History News Service.
[Rachel Buff, History Department, Bowling Green State
University, Bowling Green OH 43403. Telephone: (419)
372-2769; fax: (419) 372-7208; e-mail: rbuff@bgnet.bgsu.edu.]
History News Service
Co-Directors:
Joyce Appleby: appleby@history.ucla.edu
Telephone: 310-470-8946
James M. Banner, Jr.: jbanner@aya.yale.edu
Telephone: 202-462-5655
Website designed and administered by Christopher
Bates.
This article was posted on November 13, 2001.
Pictured at top (left to right): King Hammurabi
II of Babylon, Maximilian Robespierre, Thomas Jefferson,
Suffragists Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton,
Georges Clemenceau, Neil Armstrong on the moon.
|